A Care Sector in Peril

By Sinéad Nolan

There is no escaping it, the 2016 ‘State of Care’ report which was released this week by the Care Quality Commission was damning. On the positive side it has meant that we are now forced to look at the stark reality of care in the UK, and if possible do something to fix it. On the negative side we are left with an increasingly fragile system which is simply not fit for purpose. For anyone who hasn’t seen the report, it showed several shocking figures including that almost 1,500 care homes have closed over the past six years. The document also warns about the number of home care providers turning their back on council contracts. So what are the main problems facing care providers and the care community in general?

The cost

If home care providers are turning their back on council contracts there is usually one problem: money. The reality for most care providers is that mandatory trainings/supervisions for carers, providing core materials and paying office staff doesn’t come cheap. There are the other costs of running a small business such as rent and bills – add this to the fact that your carer must be paid a living wage and you can see how most care companies find it difficult to turn a profit. Frequently, a local council may offer a package of one half an hour visit per day – in this case the profit can be low or non-existent. Often if care companies take these very small packages, they are at risk of making a loss.

Man-hours versus outcome

The man-hours involved in providing this half hour visit are huge. It involves making phone calls, visiting the clients home, performing assessments and then writing up a lengthy, detailed person-centred care plan. The care companies then must debrief the new carer (for whom they had had to interview, train, DBS check and get references for). This short visit does also not include travelling time there and back home for the carer (for which they may only receive between 3 and 4 pounds for completing). The workload does not stop there – communication, monitoring the client, checking their daily notes and completing regular risk assessments are essential for safeguarding that client. When care agencies take on a client they also take on a responsibility – it means being able to provide cover when their allocated carer cannot make it, and being responsible if anything goes wrong.

Ageing population

So why are our systems under strain is it just government cuts – or is it also an increased need? Statistics are now showing it may be both. Simultaneous to the cuts is the increasing size of the ageing population. People are living longer, healthier lives. There is an increasing care workforce shortage, and signs are showing that technology will soon be picking up the slack. This is a controversial topic (at least when you get to the point where people are talking about care robots) yet assistive technology and technology itself seems to be the only light at the end of the tunnel in this current ageing population/care workforce shortage crisis.

Prioritising what works

The problem with the system seems to be that we are not prioritising funding in the right way. The irony of this cut in funding is that keeping people at home (rather than in hospital or anywhere else) is cheapest for the system, and time and time again evidence also shows people much prefer to stay at home. The cuts are also leading to dangerous and expensive bed blocking in our hospitals. So why are the funds being cut from the care sector when this is the sector that seems to make the most sense, not only from an ethical position, but from a monetary position too? Which begs the question: will we recover our country in care crisis? It seems, only time will tell.

Sinéad Nolan is the Research and Communications Officer for Three Sisters Care – a domiciliary care provider in London who are working on the CHIRON project. 

Are Robots the Future of Care?

by Sinéad Nolan

pepper
Pepper: Robots need love too

Elderly care is a concept we barely think about until it concerns ourselves or our loved ones, but as you may have noticed its been in the news a lot lately. The reason for this is that the over 65 population in the UK is growing. Estimated to increase 7 million in the next 20 years, soon an estimated 1.7 million people will be of an age where they require care which will create a severe workforce shortage in the care industry.

In monetary terms, this increase in population will lead to public expenditure on long term care to rise from 11.3 billion to 31.1 billion by 2032, with private expenditure to rise from 7.3 to 22.4 billion in same period. Which begs the question: how do we fill in the gaps in the care market?

robobear.jpg
Robobear shows off his lifting skills. 

Enter care robots. Apart from the workforce shortage the current care industry is largely not fit for purpose, with people’s daily living needs going unmet.

With robots such as Paro, Pepper and ChihiraAico being produced in the past few years, care robots are not an entirely new concept. Toyota recently built a nursing aide named Robina, a ‘female’ robot, that can communicate using words and gestures. Robina’s brother, Humanoid, serves as a multipurpose home assistant. He can do the dishes, take care of your parents when they’re sick, and even provide impromptu entertainment: one model plays the trumpet, another the violin.

humanoid
Humanoid entertains the crowd

However, it still seems the idea of robots in care might take a while to catch on in the UK, with the idea still seeming quite frightening to many.

An often undervalued job in our society, the role of carer requires endless supplies of patience, commitment and hard work. Carers in the UK work deal with the literal and the figurative human waste that many of us could not, or would not want to deal with. But it is an important job, vital to millions of people on a day to day basis.

Either way, it’s seems when it comes to robotics and the future of care whether we like it or not: change is near.